Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX/BR  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '17 at 04:48
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 132
60% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 210
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.2
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 61.6
36% 56.4 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 51.3
43% 53 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 234
Write 156
Mixed 165
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 5.52
63% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 7.64
30% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
692GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 73.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 36.1
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 71%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1TB
297GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 217
Mixed 198
156% 207 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.66
142% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 121%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX/BR Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback