Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 18:22
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 57.8
34% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 77.1
8-Core 77.7
10% 77.4 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
AMD(1002 9993) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.61 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S200 60GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 29 9.1 11 3.6 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.3% Very poor
Read 147
Write 46.6
Mixed 79
SusWrite 16.1
16% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 3.5
28% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 7
12% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
777GB free
Firmware: AX001U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80
Write 78.4
Mixed 21.1
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFE85F-C8KL9 FLFE85F-C8KM9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.77 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback