Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 16:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 361
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 79.6
54% 69.2 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 50.7
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 321 313 315 313 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 327
Mixed 303
SusWrite 312
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 31.6
120% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 243
210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
534GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 195
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 119
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3V Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback