Asus Commando

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Commando (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6700-$230 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 39% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 48.2 35% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 41.4 6% 44.7 Pts	64-Core 47.2 3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 47 54 57 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 76.4 Write 28.8 Mixed 51 SusWrite 46.6 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 399GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 49 55 58 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 25 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 48.9 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 465GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 74 76 76 77 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 74.1 Write 42.3 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 74.2 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 105GB free, PID 0673 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 24.9 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

CPU
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	7x
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	2x
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	3x
SSD370S 128GBTranscend $70Bench 74%, 10,510 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	8x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	6x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16