TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Inspiron 9300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 9300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C5668
Memory0.3 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 05:08
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 14.3
23% 26.9 Pts
4-Core 15.4
8-Core 15.2
2% 15.3 Pts
64-Core 15.4
1% 15.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 30.6%
 Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X300
Dell(1028 2002) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.35
0% 0.27 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS548040M9AT00 40GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MG2OA5EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 8.7 8.9 9.6 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 5.8
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.5
5% 6.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 4.22%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 256 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
9.08% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 9.08%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback