Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 23:56
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 114
53% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 318
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2274 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 64.9
61% 70.9 fps
MRender 81
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 75.5
62% 76.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 100 105 105 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 100
73% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback