Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 256
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6.53
5% 7.81 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 13.2
7% 8.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 232 200 209 130 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 439
Write 203
Mixed 200
SusWrite 180
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 24.6
126% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 176
163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 122 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 75.7
Write 111
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 121
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback