AZW U55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW U55  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U55
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190426
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 43
2-Core 97.9
42% 68 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 149
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E51 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 5.69
3% 4.62 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AZW-256G 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 39 45 35 38 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 455
Write 352
Mixed 21
SusWrite 64.4
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 1.1
53% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 0.3
45% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 69 69 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 41
Write 24.2
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 66.2
28% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U55 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback