Asus X51L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X51L  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X51L
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071222
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 560
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 40.7
1-Core 21
2-Core 21.7
21% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 19.5
8-Core 18
2% 18.8 Pts
64-Core 13.4
1% 13.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Asus(1043 14E2)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.25 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$19
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 28 33 14 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 35.2
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 21.5
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X51L Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X51L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback