Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS_W550  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 07:48
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 120
2-Core 229
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 643
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.3
18% 19.1 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.2
17% 21 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-000 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0107Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 185 188 181 198 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 441
Mixed 296
SusWrite 212
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56
191% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 334
257% 350 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 195 196 192 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 136
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 194
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS_W550 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback