Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081015
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 07:08
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 100
53% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 198
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 24
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 52 52 51 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 247
Write 227
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 50.5
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 1.3
43% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 39.6
DQ Mixed 24.2
21% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26%
Great: 100%
WD WD3200JB-00KFA0 320GB
1GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.3
Write 51.9
Mixed 39.9
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 35%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
158GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 126 125 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 86.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 123
60% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 51 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 81
Write 76.3
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 51.8
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
19GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 49.3
Write 47.9
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 64.1
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback