| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | ECT A_M_I (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte 970A-UD3 |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130128 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 27 '20 at 05:00 |
| Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63%
Good
|
55% 86.2 Pts
|
35% 290 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.9%
Above average
|
53% 73.6 fps
|
50% 62.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 384 395 429 428 434 MB/s
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
91% 403 MB/s
|
139% 46 MB/s
|
63% 133 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 119 114 118 118 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
138% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM3B8G2C1600L 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
30.8%
Below average
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
25% 8.7 GB/s
|
56% 70.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 149 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: ECT A_M_I
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 32x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $624 |