Http://www.abit.com.tw/ F-I90HD (ATI RS600-SB600)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardHttp://www.abit.com.tw/ F-I90HD (ATI RS600-SB600)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 74.2
32% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 146
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 13.3
12% 15.1 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 137 133 136 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 157
Write 151
Mixed 146
SusWrite 132
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 26.4
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 33.2
29% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 73%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB
31GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 15 13 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 22.8
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 14.9
28% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F-I90HD (ATI RS600-SB600) Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Http://www.abit.com.tw/ F-I90HD (ATI RS600-SB600)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback