Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '20 at 15:47
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 150 2-Core 301 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 931 86% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,399 87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Gigabyte(1458 2313) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 114 Parallax 228 121% 163 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 140 Splatting 159 115% 137 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 553GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 90 93 91 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 137 Write 118 Mixed 105 SusWrite 91.8 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.7 10% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 29%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 221 172 160 152 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 271 Mixed 387 SusWrite 203 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 51.2 170% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 149 119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 508GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 150 164 173 166 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 107 Write 137 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 162 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45 4,619 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 26GB free Firmware: FB4OC4DC SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 60 Write 58.8 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 60 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 34%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 868GB free, PID 8014 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 37 38 38 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 35.6 45% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V-Color TL8G36818D-E6PRSWK 2x8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 40.7 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.7 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 37.4 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,659x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,283x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,422x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,244x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,081x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,026

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16