Lenovo 80XL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80XL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 120
55% 89 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 200
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 38E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 10
Parallax 3.53
0% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.07
Splatting 8.48
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 45 33 26 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 80.5
Write 44.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 39.1
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 63%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
26GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 28 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 27.4
Mixed 23
SusWrite 29.1
37% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XL Builds (Compare 1,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback