ECS 662/1066T-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS 662/1066T-M2 (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070910
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6700-$199 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 16.6 2-Core 17.6 9% 17.1 Pts	4-Core 18.5 8-Core 24 3% 21.2 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD800LB-00DNA0 80GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 77.07W77 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 34 35 18 43 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 39.7 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 31 22% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 32%
IC35L080AVVA07-0 82GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 33GB free Firmware: VA4OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 33 35 34 32 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 37 Mixed 26 SusWrite 33.2 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 25%
Seagate ST360014A 60GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 22GB free Firmware: 3.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 34 34 34 33 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	21% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 47 Mixed 30 SusWrite 33.2 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 30%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 31GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 77 75 73 66 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 77.5 Write 81.8 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 70.9 49% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 60%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 45 44 44 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 46.6 Mixed 8 SusWrite 44.2 22% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.81% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 694 6% 694 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

ECS 662/1066T-M2

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)