Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5760 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 08:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 107
40% 68 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 149
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 mSATA 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 158 167 179 160 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 259
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 161
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 17.6
47% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 70.2
76% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 86%
Amd-raid Array 1 10TB
834GB free
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 278 269 279 279 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 14.7
Write 116
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 267
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 18
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8.1
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback