HP t610 WW Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP t610 WW Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17E2
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 01:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 53.3
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 39.8
27% 37.8 Pts
4-Core 39.8
8-Core 40.5
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 40.4
2% 40.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 17E2) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1003
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 106 50 43 59 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.4% Poor
Read 107
Write 86.9
Mixed 98
SusWrite 75.4
21% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 8.6
34% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 23
19% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.9
8% 3 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t610 WW Thin Client Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t610 WW Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback