Intel LAPQC71A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) LAPQC71A
MotherboardIntel LAPQC71A  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200313
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 13:43
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 125
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 589
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2086) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 8.59
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Intel(8086 2086) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.81
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 69.7
59% 72.1 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 61.4
56% 70.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e2000 1024G 1TB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HBAF28FT
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1246 942 698 930 997 818 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,225
Write 1,536
Mixed 170
SusWrite 938
268% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 70.1
233% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,108
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 687
584% 862 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 261%
Great: 351%
Hs-ssd-e2000 1024G 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: HBAF28FT
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1243 1052 1058 1012 601 616 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 1,427
Mixed 123
SusWrite 930
216% 967 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 69.9
227% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 683
623% 960 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 232%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGS88C-26N1900 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LAPQC71A Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Intel LAPQC71A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback