Clevo W760T/M740T/M760T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemClevo W760T/M740T/M760T  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W760T/M740T/M760T
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 16:08
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 55.7
34% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 56.7
8-Core 57.1
8% 56.9 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Clevo(1558 0805)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 232 234 237 225 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.2% Good
Read 252
Write 242
Mixed 235
SusWrite 233
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 37.5
120% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 111
86% 117 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W760T/M740T/M760T Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Clevo W760T/M740T/M760T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback