Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X299-A (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9800X-$545 4,003 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 79.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 232 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 790 76% 627 Pts	64-Core 1,361 84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.5% Poor	Lighting 30.6 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 32 25% 29.1 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 32.1 26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 342 302 307 291 328 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 427 Write 438 Mixed 343 SusWrite 319 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 24.1 78% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 69.2 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 64.8 49% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 427GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 365 367 351 373 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 452 Write 425 Mixed 371 SusWrite 367 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 24.4 82% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 76.6 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 68.7 51% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 134%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 177GB free Firmware: CP100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 78 78 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 69.5 Write 83.5 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 77.6 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 402GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 87 86 82 81 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 146 Write 153 Mixed 108 SusWrite 84.2 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 316% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 378GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 38.8 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 37.5 50% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 36 Write 38.3 Mixed 28 SusWrite 21.6 41% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 22%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 113GB free, PID fcd7 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 37.2 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 20.9 40% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$210 3,970 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 46.9 MC Mixed 26.6 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	376x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	217x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	149x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	93x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	82x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $56Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	49x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	49x

RAM
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG 4x4GBCrucialBench 82%, 497 samples	53x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	32x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16