MSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7699
MotherboardMSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 17:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 87.2
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 178
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
MSI(1462 3011) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 11.6
6% 9.46 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 9.74
8% 9.26 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 512GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTGAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 306
Write 267
Mixed 259
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 16.4
63% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 16.2
21% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 181
Mixed 92.9
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.21
95% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 GKH800UD51208-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI 760GA-P43(FX) (MS-7699)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback