| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190611 |
| Uptime | 5.4 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 22 '20 at 23:10 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
65.6%
Good
|
62% 105 Pts
|
44% 359 Pts
|
42% 686 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43%
Average
|
45% 48.7 fps
|
39% 47.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 26 19 48 55 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
43% 57.6 MB/s
|
150% 1 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
7GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
35% 26.6 MB/s
|
66% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GR7BFR8A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
75.7%
Very good
|
85% 29.7 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
50% 80.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,609 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 722x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 281x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 269x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 619x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |