Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 13:06
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 570
75% 564 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
MSI(1462 2983) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 84
56% 72.8 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 50.1
54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
223GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 455
Write 412
Mixed 441
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 15.1
106% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 12.1
93% 213 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,866
Write 1,195
Mixed 1,439
332% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 28.2
128% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 22.3
41% 77 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 191%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3400 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3403 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 33.2
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 46.5
86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback