MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 08:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 59
2-Core 114
56% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
MSI(1462 2461) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 25.4
22% 25.2 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 29.3
21% 24.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 205
Write 115
Mixed 111
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 7.25
56% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 7.16
10% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
213GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 96
Mixed 92.9
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.38
112% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59
46GB free
Firmware: V44OA9BA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 50.8
Mixed 58.3
43% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.29
100% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 25664Y133I0000SAM0 25664Y133I 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback