Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 04:28
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$233
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 787
83% 665 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 44.3
38% 48.5 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 61.7
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 465
Mixed 441
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.8
203% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 202
187% 292 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-000L1 128GB
11GB free
Firmware: DXT23L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 63 60 65 84 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 375
Write 94.9
Mixed 103
SusWrite 66.6
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 20.1
112% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 53.6
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 87.6
Write 89.1
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 76.1
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
77GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 65 65 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 84.1
Write 78.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 65.7
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF2X04JEEEXX-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 27.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback