Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 04:13
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 128
54% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 302
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 28.1
17% 23.7 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 23.9
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 117 109 103 106 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 462
Write 394
Mixed 286
SusWrite 133
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 41.3
143% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 146
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
258GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 386 417 422 441 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 439
Mixed 394
SusWrite 413
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 47.9
158% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 254
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
28GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 66.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 63.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-894.A00LF 9905403-890.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback