Asus Q504UA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus Q504UA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q504UA
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 156 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 238 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1220) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Lighting 6.43 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 6.41 5% 7.19 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 6.03 Splatting 13.2 8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 500GB 4,755 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 494 428 429 433 433 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 888 Write 818 Mixed 791 SusWrite 477 167% 743 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 66.1 224% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 912 DQ Write 739 DQ Mixed 812 611% 821 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 237%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 856GB free Firmware: SE0OA4H0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 105 105 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 99 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 102 58% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF ATECH8GPC42400S 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.8% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.5 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 22.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q504UA Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q504UA

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	27x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	27x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
850 Pro 128GBSamsung $65Bench 99%, 18,195 samples	3x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GBSamsungBench 50%, 3,179 samples	9x
HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 12GBHynixBench 52%, 747 samples	8x
HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GBHynixBench 53%, 146 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $53

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16