| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140721 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '20 at 18:13 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.2%
Above average
|
60% 95.1 Pts
|
24% 179 Pts
|
12% 192 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.2%
Above average
|
51% 60.9 fps
|
55% 66.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 162 169 47 69 85 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
31% 140 MB/s
|
35% 8.83 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
32GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
37% 50.4 MB/s
|
121% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
168GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 76 75 74 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
69% 93.8 MB/s
|
149% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-049.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.4%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
55% 72.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,329 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 266x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 189x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 442x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 147x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $227 |