Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 18 '17 at 23:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 467
62% 466 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 515
Write 406
Mixed 412
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 19.8
111% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 19.5
24% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
262GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 88.6
Mixed 83.4
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
131GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 106
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.24
88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 186C0 V3 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback