MSI MS-1759

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-1759  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 512
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 6.5
3% 8.96 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.61
5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 306 310 308 305 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 469
Mixed 384
SusWrite 322
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 50.3
167% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 126 127 127 127 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 129
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 128
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1759 Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback