| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W480 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2917-A1 |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110406 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '20 at 09:35 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3450
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
62.8%
Good
|
62% 103 Pts
|
37% 294 Pts
|
20% 328 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
31.1%
Below average
|
32% 35.2 fps
|
30% 36.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 198 228 232 227 229 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
50% 222 MB/s
|
50% 14.7 MB/s
|
147% 196 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
38.6%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W480 Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W480
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples | 10x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 6x |
| Xeon X3480IntelBench 72%, 524 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)ATIBench 9%, 444 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |