Acer Aspire 4752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 4752  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4752
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 04:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 367
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0506) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 170 84 63 84 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 414
Write 253
Mixed 310
SusWrite 123
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 22.5
88% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 183
160% 237 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
149GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 74 73 77 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 73.2
Write 56.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 73.7
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53L4P-2HBMJR-MR8LF M471B5273DH0-YKO 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4752 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback