Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 19:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 95
2-Core 198
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 596
56% 467 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 82.5
Parallax 74.8
76% 83.5 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 78.4
62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,368
Write 1,140
Mixed 134
193% 881 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 60.6
189% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 345
359% 590 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 180 183 185 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 148
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 183
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 31.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback