Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 18 '17 at 13:46
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 534
72% 536 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 50.6
34% 47.5 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 39.3
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 506
Write 416
Mixed 420
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 27.4
108% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 82.4
DQ Mixed 44.3
49% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
311GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63% Good
Read 116
Write 104
Mixed 98.9
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
315GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 70.4
Write 69.5
Mixed 66.2
52% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.32
69% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
295GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 57
Write 14.3
Mixed 14.4
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.24
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
176GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 73.8
Write 76.6
Mixed 71.4
56% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.37
92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
756GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 39.8
Mixed 11.9
36% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.19
21% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $727
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback