Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 12:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 152
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 520
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 93.2
Parallax 174
79% 121 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 131
Splatting 135
100% 119 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1350 1167 1012 723 738 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2452
Write 1,435
Mixed 1,614
SusWrite 1,062
365% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 54.4
184% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 569
415% 545 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 244%
Great: 334%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
223GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 201 202 220 218 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 351
Write 259
Mixed 285
SusWrite 210
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 30.6
123% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 232
177% 239 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 190 192 196 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 40.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 19.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback