Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '20 at 17:34
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 127 58% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 190 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1554 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.9% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 64.4 Parallax 77.3 44% 65.2 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 55.2 Splatting 53.7 47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 94.5 Mixed 112 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 24.7 82% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 95.9 DQ Mixed 91.1 73% 102 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 355GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,204 Write 32.8 Mixed 67.3 551% 768 MB/s	4K Read 269 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 11,451% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580 15,105 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 171GB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 136 137 138 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 126 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 135 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 7,948 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 11.2 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	59x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	46x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16