Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 134
58% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 428
40% 335 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 64
Parallax 52.2
53% 60.5 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 69.2
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 375 413 422 384 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 427
Mixed 416
SusWrite 378
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 40.1
133% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 229
175% 237 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 125%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
681GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 84.7
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 104
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 75%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
555GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 181 179 179 179 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 123
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 176
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback