Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 188
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 680
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 849
53% 849 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 151
Parallax 128
112% 139 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1128 870 866 871 862 868 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,355
Write 2,172
Mixed 1,626
SusWrite 911
395% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 84.1
267% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 747
538% 701 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 264%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
231GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 462 461 464 465 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 444
Mixed 376
SusWrite 463
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 43.4
153% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
123GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 462 463 464 465 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 453
Mixed 361
SusWrite 463
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 45.7
153% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 344
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
174GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 184 83 191 431 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 109
Mixed 394
SusWrite 241
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 40.4
153% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 107 107 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 68.5
Write 60
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 107
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3300 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 51.1
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 22.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 124%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback