Lenovo 20EQS3G300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20EQS3G300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS3G300
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 07:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 581
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5239
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 5.47
5% 5.12 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 8.04
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0DL003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 357 371 378 389 379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 437
Write 388
Mixed 338
SusWrite 371
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 34.3
122% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 300
212% 265 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback