Asus F1A55-M LX PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LX PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '20 at 18:08
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3650 APU 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 80.9 38% 60.5 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 158 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D 4,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.53 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 2.88 3% 3.76 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.74 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFME1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 167 127 128 126 131 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 185 Write 160 Mixed 147 SusWrite 144 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 19.2 74% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 28.7 24% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.45% Terrible	Read 32.1 Write 20.2 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 14.7 23% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.1 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX PLUS

CPU
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	5x
A4-3300 APUAMD $90Bench 35%, 2,884 samples	4x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6370DAMDBench 2%, 517 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	1x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 4GBUnknownBench 39%, 39 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GBTranscendBench 26%, 2,367 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16