Asus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '17 at 17:16
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 102
51% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 6
3% 5.21 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 4.48
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
457GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 70.5
Write 84.4
Mixed 65.4
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.24
73% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
261GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
45% Average
Read 87.2
Write 69.4
Mixed 63.9
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.38
97% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
47GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 90.9
Mixed 102
74% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 114%
Kingston DTLocker+G3 16GB
3GB free, PID 169d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 152
Write 22.8
Mixed 38.2
66% 71 MB/s
4K Read 8.78
4K Write 4.41
4K Mixed 2.47
266% 5.22 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M-PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M-PRO R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback