Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 10:00
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 791
82% 660 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 99.9
Parallax 169
97% 129 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 110
Splatting 136
96% 114 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 197 187 189 185 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 471
Mixed 338
SusWrite 223
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.3
189% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 251
211% 309 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 107%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 206 206 206 204 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 148
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 204
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
21GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 134
Write 118
Mixed 88
SusWrite 102
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
18GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46% Average
Read 86.7
Write 78
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 73
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback