Asrock B250 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B250 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '17 at 12:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 783
84% 666 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 73.6
61% 75.5 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 70.7
58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 332
Mixed 307
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 20.3
86% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 44.3
96% 200 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 154
Mixed 112
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.21
88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B250 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback