Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 173% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 152% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 155 2-Core 307 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 860 85% 694 Pts	64-Core 858 53% 858 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4800 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	185% Outstanding	Lighting 272 Reflection 250 Parallax 281 222% 267 fps	MRender 296 Gravity 238 Splatting 144 176% 226 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD20EZRZ-00Z5HB0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 434 385 170 139 123 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 506 Write 480 Mixed 401 SusWrite 285 310% 418 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 63.1 11,113% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 362 3,327% 363 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 68%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 359GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 89 90 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 74.4 Write 66 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 88.3 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 7TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 180 185 187 186 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 198 Write 204 Mixed 129 SusWrite 186 242% 179 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2971 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 26.1 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 38.4 SC Mixed 29.2 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 53.8 74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	925x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	326x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	186x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	272x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	220x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	204x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	93x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16