Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.65 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 148 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 499 47% 390 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 120 Parallax 116 91% 116 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 104 Splatting 106 86% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 305 364 372 363 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 411 Write 383 Mixed 322 SusWrite 337 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 45.3 147% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 97.8 DQ Mixed 57.9 48% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 121 182 184 184 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 170 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 166 95% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CT51264BA186DJ-8FA KHX1866C10D3/8G CT51264BA186DJ-8FA 24GB 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16