Alienware 18

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware 18  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 01W2J2
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '17 at 03:13
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 391
49% 371 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M290X
Dell(1028 05AB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 18.9
12% 15.2 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 15.7
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 496
Write 328
Mixed 288
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 0.88
24% 8.36 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 38.6
DQ Mixed 0.85
8% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 118%
Liteonit DMT-80 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: DMH1
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 423
Write 200
Mixed 269
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 11.9
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 78.5
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 30.7
48% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 18 Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware 18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback