MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 07:14
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 378
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2761) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 53.7
35% 42.5 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 38.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 470
Write 158
Mixed 190
SusWrite 156
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 31.1
132% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 190
163% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
339GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 116 114 118 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 150
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 115
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
406GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 156 157 157 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 156
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
393GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 161
Write 131
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 150
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
416GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 163
Write 112
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 118
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1600 CL10 Series 8502 1600 CL10 Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 MPower (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751) - $444

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback