Hp-pavilion KQ510AA-ABA s3507c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Hp-pavilion KQ510AA-ABA s3507c (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Irvine
Memory	1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080724
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 00:43
Run Duration	588 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 48.4 23% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 46.1 8-Core 46.2 6% 46.2 Pts	64-Core 47.2 3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 852D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 145 3283 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2526 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9505 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2519 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2526 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.6% Average	Read 78.3 Write 66.9 Mixed 26.5 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.06 18% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 58%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB 427 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Read 12.6 Write 3.39 Mixed 1.87 6% 5.94 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.002 4% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 11%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0111 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	4.05% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 4.61 Mixed 5.74 9% 9.26 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.12 12% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.05% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16