Asus G750JS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 507
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Asus(1043 157D) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 30
Parallax 40.9
0% 23.6 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 25
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 97 104 107 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 103
62% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
932GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 126 125 126 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 124
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 126
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback